Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toby Van Woudenberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is to delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Van Woudenberg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My PROD has been removed, so I will nominate this for deletion. I have looked [and] cannot find any reliable sources discussing this young man beyond a passing mention in the Newcastle Herald article here that is not substantially about him. Seems to fail WP:GNG. MisterRandomized (talk) 01:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I myself had reviewed this and planned to nominate, nothing at all actually convincing for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 01:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Can't find any secondary sources other than the Herald Article. He is not mentioned in any other major newspapers nor is there any coverage of the subject in question. CycoPenguin (talk) 01:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete only passing mentions. I find it hard to believe that an 18 year old would have an established career. LibStar (talk) 12:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.