Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toby Mills

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 23:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Mills[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough sources currently in the article to meet GNG, and my BEFORE check didn't find much. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Television. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per WP:HEY I have started improving the article. Time of nomination vs time of writing. I have added a reception section, award nominations, information on the character's writing and development. I found a good selection of secondary sources. I have demonstrated the subject passes GNG. I have more sources to aid further expansion and I will continue to improve it over the coming days.Rain the 1 23:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV with User:Raintheone's efforts. Also WP:HEY. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – sorry to sound like a parrot, but per WP:HEY this article has massively been improved due to RT1's efforts. The character meets notability standards due to the number of secondary sources that show significant coverage both from the years he was on the soap and thereafter, many sources of which come from sources not related to TV at all. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.