Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Morter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 11:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tobias Morter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Refs provided do not mention subject, and there is not "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources" as needed for an article. —SMALL JIM 20:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A bit of advertising: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearse dynasty is closely related to this topic. Zakhalesh (talk) 20:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable at best, joke at worst. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
deletion not nesersary i am currently deleting infomation that i can find any references for or any websites with infomation. Of course if i find anything refs will be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hahahahahg123 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC) — Hahahahahg123 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Editing complete"' i have removed infomation that was wrong or i could find any infomation about it. But i can see significant references to make article notable. Deletion not nessersary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hahahahahg123 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 15 April 2011 (UTC) — Hahahahahg123 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
"' Deletion notice remove"' I will take the step to remove the notice, I found suitable reasons for this. Noted above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hahahahahg123 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC) — Hahahahahg123 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

No one's going to remove the notice until this discussion is complete. Zakhalesh (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for a lack of notability. Dennis Brown (talk) 23:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom - frankie^MR (talk) 00:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, individual does not pass WP:GNG. Looks like advertising to me. --NellieBly (talk) 01:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: certain users participating in this debate are confirmed socks (quack quack). See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dingdongdingdong123/Archive. Zakhalesh (talk) 18:07, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.