Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Alpsten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tobias Alpsten[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:A7 speedy deletion. Clearly fails WP:GNG with zero reliable sources. Part of a recent spree by WP:SPA accounts promoting the Alpsten family; see Alpsten family, Ellen Alpsten and Caspar Alpsten. No claim to meeting WP:ANYBIO. To be honest, I'm not sure what the actual claim to notability is here. Wikipedia doesn't need an article on every single person who founds a company, LinkedIn is a better and more appropriate platform for promotion than Wikipedia.

During my WP:BEFORE search I found trivial coverage only; see Chronicle Live and Digital LA. Such coverage does not count towards GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Search for coverage reveals nothing that rises to GNG, and the bio makes no clear claim of notability. HouseOfChange (talk) 21:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - not notable.Ingratis (talk) 22:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:GNG and bordering on CSD. I notice the article on his wife is new, written by a sock farm, which I'm probably going to put up. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SNOW close, not notable in the least. Note @Dennis Brown that I actually did CSD it originally. The CSD tag was improperly removed by one of the other socks (now blocked). — Insertcleverphrasehere^{(or here)_{(or here)^{(or here)}}} 08:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - speedily. Fails GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, no in-depth coverage can be found.MartinWilder (talk) 01:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A clear case of not meeting notability guidelines. Such-change47 (talk) 02:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.