Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Title track

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep as DisAmb page. SilkTork *^YES! 23:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title track[edit]

Straight-up dictionary definition laced with WP:OR. I see no way that this can extend beyond a dicdef without automatically lapsing into a list of songs that should be title tracks but aren't, pseudo-title tracks that are extensions of the album's title, etc. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 16:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Perhaps this should be a dabpage:
- Title track, a track having the same name as the album or movie it comes from
- Title Track, a song on the ablum The Stage Names
- Title Track, a song on the album We Have the Facts and We're Voting Yes

— LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It makes me sad to say -- I do enjoy having this article around -- but after some research I think TPH is right, and I would !vote delete. But, right away, I think LinguistAtLarge has the right idea. So I'm going to be bold and make the change (but leave the AFD template, of course). Perhaps this answers TPHs concerns and this AFD is moot? -FrankTobia (talk) 21:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the disambiguation page anyway, as it's helpful. DreamGuy (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.