Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiny Rascal Gang (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was G4 and salt by Ultraexactzz. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny Rascal Gang[edit]

This article was deleted via VfD back in 2005, but the article then was a bare stub. While this article is expanded, the flaws still remain. It is unreferenced. While the group may be notable, the article is not verifiable. —C.Fred (talk) 16:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable, the only thing a Google search yields are Myspace pages and Youtube videos. Even if someone wanted to reference this article, they couldn't, which is why it keeps getting deleted in the first place. For What It's Worth, the contributor who keeps recreating the article launches personal threats against anyone that attempts to edit or delete it. 74.248.71.201 (talk) 17:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - NN street gang... the g-hits I found were either myspace/youtube hits, or hits for a band. Also, the opening paragraph is a copyvio of this page... - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and reference. There are lots of google news results.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 19:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. Also delete the page at User:Avengercrunk to make it more difficult to recreate. I would recommend posting this to ANI to request a review of that editors contributions to see if a block is needed to prevent recreation of this material. This has been deleted numerous times, but this editor has continued to recreate the page against community consensus and is now wasting everyone's time with abuse of process. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I've left a notice at ANI since this is clearly a block evading single purpose sockpuppet. I invite all users to review that and advise. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 20:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.