Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tino Quezada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 15:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tino Quezada[edit]

Non-notable per WP:ENT, unreferenced, prod contested by anonymous editor Per Ardua (talk) 20:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Per Ardua (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This non-notable article probably could have gone speedy. Capitalismojo (talk) 23:11, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Horribly fails WP:ENT and roles like "Bus passenger" and "corrections officer" aren't going to get you past it either. Working "alongside" notable people won't do it either. Notability isn't contagious. Future roles don't help and a word to the author: Proof your promotional efforts. It's up and coming, not comming. (And up and coming tells us he hasn't arrived yet). Niteshift36 (talk) 05:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and allow return once WP:BIO or WP:GNG can be met. The one-sentence article sums itup nicely: "Tino Quezada is an up and comming actor from New York City. He has worked alongside Jammie Foxx, Gerard Butler and is starring alongside Dev Pattel in M. Knight's, The last Airbender." Wikipedia does not want "up-and-coming". Wikipedia does not want note by relationship. Wikipedia wants here-and-arrived per WP:N. When Tino finally "arives", he'll be welcomed back. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 03:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.