Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tino Hernandez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tino Hernandez[edit]

Tino Hernandez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. Currently, there are seven sources in the article. One is a copy on an Instragram post; one is a podcast; and one is primary. This only leaves three references, two of which are the same article and all of which look like standard paid-for PR pieces. Searching online turns up very little, but that little just ended up being more of the same. I don't see any sign of notability either in the article or online. - Bilby (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is spammy PR fluff. the only Tino Martinez I bring up that might be notable is a NY Times article about the head of the Housing Authority there. I hope they give Tino his money back, he paid them to write a deleted article. Oaktree b (talk) 03:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhh ok, he's a crypto person. Now it makes sense. This is more crypto fluff, trying to boost their image. Oaktree b (talk) 03:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete PR puff piece with no redeeming features. scope_creepTalk 10:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Tino Hernandez*** not Martinez and I'm actually a real estate and consulting firm owner who happens to be in crypto since 2014. Not trying to boost my "image". I have a real brick and mortar business. I speak on stages around the world teaching people about real estate and sales. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.183.150.82 (talk) 18:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.