Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tinida

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tinida[edit]

Tinida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Singer who has released 4 singles (on her husband's label) none of which has charted. Emeraude (talk) 10:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unfortunately as it seems WP:TOOSOON for an article at this stage with no charting songs, no albums released and a lack of coverage such as no bio at AllMusic. No objection to recreation if she has future success such as charting singles and album etc, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I don't think this is too soon, it actually seems as though her career (such as it was) has been and gone... those four singles mentioned in the article appear to have been the only ones of her career. It takes some doing to be so obscure as to not have any entries on Discogs, but this artist has managed it. Clearly written as a promotional effort, by a SPA who by sheer coincidence just happens to have the same nickname as her husband/manager/record label boss. And the record label is also defunct now – I'm guessing it was only created to put out his wife's records. Richard3120 (talk) 17:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.