Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tincta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tincta[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not meet the requirements for WP:Notability TJH2018 talk 15:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 15:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as advertising for an unconvincing software article, it goes to specifics about what it is, yet there are no actual substantial sources, let alone convincing, and my searches unsurprisingly found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a basic WP:BEFORE shows a few mentions in category reviews, but not much more - David Gerard (talk) 19:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO; a product brochure in the form of a Wiki article. Self-sourced with no indications of notability or significance; A7 material. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.