Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Wesson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. As far as policy-based rationales go, the valid parts of the nomination appear to be concerns vis-a-vis WP:BLP1E. Other aspects of the nomination are subjective, and not guideline- or policy-based. WP:BLP1E concerns have been countered by the !vote by User:Frietjes per the subject's appearance on multiple seasons of Survivor. The !vote from User:ApprenticeFan suggests notability, but doesn't specifically delineate how this is so. The "strong delete" !vote by User: Dobbyelf62 is not guideline- or policy-based. Ultimately, there's no consensus in the discussion at this time. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 08:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Wesson[edit]

Tina Wesson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't believe how all these Survivor bio articles keep showing up again after they've been redirected. I much as I've loved Survivor since I was a boy, I just see no reason to keep some of these articles on the contestants :( Tina is clearly not known for anything other than Survivor, and being a three time contestant doesn't make someone notable. Teaching outdoor survival classes and publishing a book are both good accomplishments, but those things don't automatically constitute encyclopedic notability. She's just another person who's lived a cool life. Survivorfan1995 (talk) 19:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep has a little notability after won her first season. ApprenticeFan work 14:34, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete Did nothing notable outside of survivor. She appeared three times on the show, which doesn't mean she has to have a page. There's no reason why this page should be kept. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep, appeared on multiple seasons, so goes beyond "one event". Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: Trying to relist one more time in hope to get more opinions--Ymblanter (talk) 12:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 12:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.