Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Cheri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Cheri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT: none of the current references constitute significant coverage in external sources. I looked for new ones and found nothing useful. Porn industry awards don't count towards anything now that PORNBIO has been deprecated. Cheers, gnu 57 02:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 02:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 02:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 02:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 02:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Also did a decent search and found nada. There's nothing to suggest that sources might exist elsewhere. This is firmly one for the delete pile. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify The awards look notable and she does show up on some searches, but none of the sources are RS. Ambrosiawater (talk) 18:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that none of the sources are RS is the exact notability problem. The award won (note that it is singular) would not have passed the "well-known and significant industry award" test of the now-deprecated PORNBIO. Also, nominations and scene-related wins didn't count under PORNBIO, and they especially don't count now. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ENT - no detectable fan base, no significant roles, no unique contributions.--Goldsztajn (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Failure of WP:BASIC and WP:ENT with no independent reliable source coverage whatsoever. Would not have passed the now-superseded PORNBIO SNG as I stated above. Not even the semi-reliable porn trade mags have anything substantial to say about this performer. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.