Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Armstrong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Any merger is best discussed here (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 19:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Armstrong[edit]

This video game character has no Wikipedia:Notability,same as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zafina, this one should be deleted or merged as well. There is already a "list of character" article for this game series. And "other game characters also have their own articles" isn't a valid argument for this one to pass the Wikipedia:Notability requirement. Shrine Maiden (talk) 18:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List_of_Dead_or_Alive_characters. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep she is one of the flagship characters of the DoA franchise. However, the article needs some cleaning up. JuJube (talk) 23:47, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You claiming her to be "flagship" doesn't mean anything. Give credible outside sources to prove that she is notable. Shrine Maiden (talk) 01:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, want to avoid being a Richard here, Sparky. Tina Armstrong was, as the article states, present in every DOA iteration and used frequently in merchandising. Cleanup would involve finding those sources. I'm gonna invoke WP:SOFIXIT and say that that's what should be done, instead of taking the lazy way and just deleting it. But I'm not gonna be the one to do it since I neither know nor care all that much about the franchise. JuJube (talk) 03:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or redirect to List of Dead or Alive characters, as it would be a useful redirect. 70.51.11.210 (talk) 09:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikipedia:Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Wikipedia is. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 11:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Dead or Alive characters. I hate to use the C-word, but I'm afraid that's what this is. I also don't think there isn't anything worth merging to the list. And no, it's not that WP:IDONTLIKEIT, either. MuZemike (talk) 16:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weather forecast also calls for WP:SNOW. MuZemike (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate Keep: She's definitely a "flagship" character. She's been used as a marketing portrait, and I'm sure we can find plenty of sources speaking on her. However, if it can't be done, I'll support merging. King Zeal (talk) 17:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per King Zeal, otherwise Merge Edward321 (talk) 00:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or redirect She may be a flagship character, but it doesn't seem to have benefited her in terms of appropriate sources. A merge/redirect to List_of_Dead_or_Alive_characters makes sense until this character can be verified by reliable third-party sources, at which point notability is certain. Randomran (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This character is notable because she appears in both video games and a film. Only a handful of the millions of video game characters out there have also made the leap to the big screen. And she has also been made into toys something else only a handful of video game characters could claim. And yes, she is also covered in reliable third party sources, such as "Girls of DOAU: Tina: This simple country girl will snap you in two in the blink of an eye. New screens and direct-feed movies" on IGN. She is also an award winning fictional character. Winning a televised award is additionally notable. As usual, I have revised the article accordingly. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.