Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timpanogas Regional Hospital (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per consensus (non-admin closure). Finalnight (talk) 02:42, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Timpanogas Regional Hospital[edit]

Delete this was nominated in a mass-nomination achieving the usual "no consensus" 7 months ago, since that time, no references, nor anything showing notability has been added to the article; hospitals are not inherently notable and this one has no indication showing its notability; WP is not a health care directory nor a guide for your HMO. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC) *Delete no references. Chikwangwa (talk) 23:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)!vote from banned user struck The Evil Spartan (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - eight months without trying to establish notability. LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 00:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 00:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references and corrected the name of the article. It should be Timpanogos Regional Hospital --Eastmain (talk) 00:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - with Orem, Utah. There is really no data here for an article, and the two sources so far procured are the same source dealing with the opening of the hospital/first delivery. This to me violates WP:NOT#NEWS, since the source are really not covering the hospital as much as the event of its opening. Without other sources, and given there isn't much info, I will recommend merge. If that doesn't work, I will be fine with delete. LonelyBeacon (talk) 00:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not assert notability. JFW | T@lk 01:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain and the sources found here. While there are a fair number of "X was treated at the hospital", there's enough about it's opening and operations to write an article. As a regional hospital I think it has enough coverage to pass WP:ORG especially when searching under the proper name. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 02:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all those snazzy new sources Eastmain added to the article as well as the ones linked by TravellingCari. Easily satisfies WP:CORP for me. Vickser (talk) 02:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vickser. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 07:50, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Most acute care hospitals will be notable. So deleting this article does nor appear justified. The lack of interest in editors in improving this past a stub is the problem. Maybe better categories would help get some notice. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:58, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.