Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy S. Wilkinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 18:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy S. Wilkinson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG Dougweller (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, the author appears unmentioned from any scholarship, also Lulu.com is a self publishing place, therefore not notable. SADADS (talk) 21:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm seeing a lot of text and a lot of claims; however, none of them are meaningful. --Calton | Talk 14:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, thie site appears only for self promotion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.235.232 (talk) 01:24, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:01, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- All of this seems to be original research devoted to publicizing self-published materials Vartanza (talk) 05:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; I can't find significant coverage for this author. Joe Chill (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.