Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timmion Records (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Timmion Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current coverage fails WP:GNG Setreis (talk) 15:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Setreis (talk) 15:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was delete. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions: 2013-03 ✗ delete

Logs: 2021-03 ✍️ create, 2013-03 ✗ deleted

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 02:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Already deleted as non-notable once. Has there been subsequent significant coverage? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they have been mentioned in many reliable sources since 2013, such as Billboard and El País. Whether the coverage is significant enough or not, I'm still not sure. MarioGom (talk) 07:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There are a few promising sources, like this one in Rolling Stone and a this one in Billboard (which, granted, is related), as well as a few sources which look ok but which I'm not familiar with like Inner... but not quite enough to justify a stand-alone article. I'm hesitating to come in with a "weak delete," however, because I wonder what people have found when searching in Finnish? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: in Finnish I found mostly just mentions. However this (in the biggest music magazine of the country) is about the label. This (in the biggest daily newspaper) contains at least a few sentences as does this (financial newspaper). One should also search with "Timmion Cutting" because that's their brand name for manufacturing the physical records. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — If we are to treat this as an organization then it fails the notability threshold for organizations. Celestina007 (talk) 22:41, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Riteboke (talk) 07:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.