Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Argentine history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Argentine history[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an incomplete list that may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 12:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Personally, I'm not a big fan of the "timeline" approach in general. But timeline articles have been generally accepted, and a single AFD isn't the place to seek consensus to the contrary. In any case, no valid deletion rationale was raised here. Incomplete lists, or even lists which are impossible to complete, are not in and of themselves cause for deletion. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 13:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 14:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 14:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: as per Squeamish Ossifrage. "Incomplete article" is not valid rationale for deletion of article. --Human3015^TALK 14:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nominator has not presented any valid reason for deletion. Bharatiya29 (talk) 15:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per rationales above. Vrac (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.