Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time compressor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time compressor[edit]

There's a lot I could say about this article, but I think I'll just say Wikipedia does not publish original research and leave it at that. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 17:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as nonsense, or as a snowball.Kww (talk) 17:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as nonsense. Corvus coronoides _talk 18:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with nom that it's at least WP:OR, and it may be nonsense as well. -FrankTobia (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Definite original research bordering on a load of unsalvageable nonsense. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:HOAX-ish nonsense. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - gibberish. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} 19:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR - maybe redirect to time travel?--Kiyarrllston 19:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable original research. --Beloved Freak 20:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete as there's simply nothing else that can be done here. Someguy1221 (talk) 20:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah the joys of physics made up by those who don't learn it first! There's already a machine for doing this. It's called a commercial jet aircraft. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete next time use the CSD template RogueNinja_talk 23:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Time to crush this one flat. Mandsford (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nonsense. KurtRaschke (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original Research, no citations. Seems like an idea by someone with poor high school physics education. Agree with all above. Pookakitty (talk) 11:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.