Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Warner Cable Rochester Channel Lineup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time Warner Cable Rochester Channel Lineup[edit]

This is a list of TV stations and from WP:NOT#DIR Wikipedia is not a TV Guide -Bogsat 16:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not your TV Guide. Keeping this means keeping channel line-ups for every cable/satellite provider in every metropolitan area. And if more cities start deregulating cable TV service, this would get even further out of control. Caknuck 17:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ouch... This reminds me of when I was new to Wikipedia and tried to add a listing of flights from Syracuse to DC... Yes, delete as per above. -newkai t-c 17:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as per nomination scope_creep 19:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Which criteria would you use from WP:CSD in order to speedy this? (aeropagitica) 22:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Are we going to have channel line-ups for every city on Earth? --Charlene 00:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sets a bad precedent to let this stay. Robovski 01:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 or just Delete as pointless, meaningless, trivial, non-notable listcruft. Good god! If A7 doesn't apply, I think it's time to come up with a speedy criterion that would! :) Xtifr _tälk 01:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm afraid that I don't think there really is speedy deletion criteria that would apply. Still, Wikipedia is not a directory or collection of indiscriminate information.-- danntm ^T _C 04:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If you want another city's cable lineup, there's always zap2it.com... Kirjtc2 13:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We nor the cable subscribers of Rochester need this. --Oakshade 16:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.