Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Share

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 03:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time Share[edit]

Article is about an announced film project that does not meet the notability guidelines for future films. The project was revealed in the summer of 2005, and there has been no progress with it since. There's no telling if the project will enter production, but if it does, I have no issue with recreation. In the meantime, though, the lack of significant coverage and guarantee of a full-fledged film article doesn't warrant an article on this meek prospect. To the closing admin, if the result is deletion, the redirects Time Share (film) and Time Share (2006 film) should be deleted as well. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RS and WP:NFF. There seem to be no reliable sources to show that this film meets the notability guidelines, and it does not meet the guidelines for film articles. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 00:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - While imdb.com is not a good source, it usually will include information such as "director" and "official site", which it does not. Attempts to find a site or information other than "proposed project" was not found. Fails WP:NFF. LonelyBeacon (talk) 00:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFF. Mh29255 (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it can be revived, when becomes more real. Pundit|utter 01:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Later...Happy New Year!! Malinaccier (talk) 01:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the notability guidelines for films; should the project enter production, the article can be recreated. Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 01:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and lack of sources Frank Anchor, U. S. American (talk, contribs) 01:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect to Timeshare, I think it's plausible that someone could think it's two words instead of one. TJ Spyke 02:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, "Hilarious hi-jinks ensue!". Uh-huh. Either a hoax or WP:CRYSTAL. Lankiveil (talk) 03:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Comment: I've placed the headline on the AFD's talk page to authenticate that such a project was announced and also for later usage if production ever starts. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 06:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-has no merits and doesn't follow the guidelines for film pages. H*bad (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 07:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Timeshare per TJ Spyke. Tevildo (talk) 11:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect - fails WP:NFF, and redirect to Timeshare. Macy's 123 review me 16:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- doesn't meet WP:MOVIE since it's not yet in production -- and add any relevant information to either the articles about the actors concerned or, my second choice, to an article about the topic of timeshares. (My suggestion is that films like this are usually just a WP:COATRACK for jokes and not about the topic per se.) And if you ever see me going into this movie, mercy-killing would be appropriate. "Hilarious hi-jinks" indeed. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, "I doubt its going to be produced any time soon, and the stub right now is pretty useless 76.196.36.174 (talk) 08:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.