Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Bomb (Alyssa Reid album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Time Bomb (Alyssa Reid album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability questionable JacobiJonesJr (talk) 00:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 02:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Alyssa Reid. I did find a review by Confront Magazine but otherwise can't really find a lot of sources. The article mentions the album reached #56 but I'm not sure that makes the article notable either. Therefore, redirecting to Alyssa Reid seems like the best thing to do. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – There is significant coverage in Canadian newspapers; see the sources I've added just now. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 20:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I haven't been able to find those sources. Would you happen to have a link to them? I can confirm that the album reached #49 on the Billboard charts and that Satisfaction Guaranteed reach #25 on the Hot 100. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrLinkinPark333 (talk • contribs)
  - I found them in an offline library database of newspaper and magazine articles; I can't find them online. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Correction: Actually the Canadian Press article by Nick Patch is online here. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SpinningSpark 19:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Questionable whether this is best covered as a standalone article rather than merging to the article on Reid, but I see no benefit to be gained from deletion. --Michig (talk) 19:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.