Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Werenko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Werenko[edit]

Tim Werenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He's a video producer and New York theater actor but it's difficult to show what independent notability he has from his companies (Central Park Media, DuArt Film and 3Beep). AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I have not been able to find any independent, reliable sources that help establish notability for the subject. Mduvekot (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is a tough one, lots of little bits and pieces in articles, but nothing really notable. Esw01407 (talk) 17:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.