Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Sullivan (director)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), nominator has change vote to keep. Paragon12321 (talk) 17:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tim Sullivan (director)[edit]
- Tim Sullivan (director) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prod tag removed. No sources, novice director with no evidence of any notability. Likely vanispamicruft. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 21:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Did a quick web search and found that Sullivan is a bit more notable than the article stated.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7], et al. There's a lot to work with to prove notability. Kind of a shame that no one took the time to source the article. Care if I have a go and making it worthy of Wiki? Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 03:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'll be glad to change my mind if notability can be established. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 16:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have created a sandbox for this article. Will work to improve it over the next couple days. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 06:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional Check HERE. I have definitely found enough to prove notability and improve the article. Now to work.... Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 19:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Addendum Have moved the informations from my sandbox to the page in question. I did a few format/style tweaks to give it some polish. I invite cleanup. Thanks folks. It was fun. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 22:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional Check HERE. I have definitely found enough to prove notability and improve the article. Now to work.... Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 19:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the various sources uncovered by Michael Q. Schmidt; seems like a clean-up issue now. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He's notable enough to have a listing here. The original argument for deleting this was that he only directed one straight-to-video film, which was untrue. PNW Raven (talk) 22:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per new sources unearthed by Michael Q. Schmidt. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 23:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.