Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Branom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:11, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Branom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a Notable Person, seems like another personal article for some unknown singer. Tyros1972 Talk 11:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although the article provides a dozen references, none are from Reliable Sources (we're talking Facebook and even answers.com). A Google News search found only a passing mention in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. None of of his bands seems notable enough for a redirect. --MelanieN (talk) 02:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.