Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Baldermann (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Baldermann[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination on behalf of Mpen320 (talk · contribs), whose rationale was posted on the talk page and is included verbatim below. On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article continues to fail to meet notability criteria described here. Mpen320 talk to me 14:28 Central Time, April 17, 2017.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA (talk) 12:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA (talk) 12:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. New Lenox is not large enough that being its mayor would constitute an automatic WP:NPOL pass in and of itself, but the depth and breadth of sourcing here is not sufficient to get him past the "who have received significant press coverage" condition in NPOL #2: it's virtually all local coverage, of the type that every mayor of every place could always routinely expect to receive, and neither expands beyond the purely local nor covers him in the context of anything substantive enough to deem his mayoralty a topic of special interest. Bearcat (talk) 15:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.