Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tillandsia 'Calum'

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tillandsia 'Calum'[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Name of a variety of Tillandsia plant genus - for instance, BSI lists several hundred cultivars like this one of this genus alone which are being constantly created by various growers.[1] No indication this variety is notable per se. Natural plants of course are notable – artificial varieties not really sure. — kashmiri ^TALK 19:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion I agree that, unlike species, cultivars are not intrinsically notable, and so the normal criteria for notability apply. This cultivar doesn't meet them. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Plantdrew (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.