Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilford Kutch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 13:18, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tilford Kutch[edit]

NN ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 00:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete although he did establish the burgeoning metropolis of Cokeville, Wyoming. Aplomado - U T C 00:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the founder of a small town and a local trader is not notable. Royboy crashfan 00:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Poorly written article and clearly nn.--Strothra 01:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete founding a town is sorta-notable. Not really though. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 03:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. Sheehan (Talk) 04:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Founding a town is very notable. Loom91 09:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn. --Ter e nc e Ong 09:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as non-notable. I would say redirect to the town article and mention him there, but I don't want to split the vote causing no consensus. A redirect can be made after deletion. -- Kjkolb 11:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to town article. RGTraynor 15:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per RGTraynor. Fishhead64 20:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, w/cleanup and expansion. Founding a town is good enough for me. -Colin Kimbrell 19:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.