Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TikiWiki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. --Coredesat 05:43, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
TikiWiki[edit]
Fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:VERIFY, there are no links asserting notability. Jackaranga 16:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, could have speedy'd by db-spam--Jac16888 17:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, obvious spam, plus the name is awful. Realkyhick 17:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There are loads of articles like this about software, I have tagged many with PROD, but people perhaps affiliated with the software just remove the tag without improving, so I have to use AfD, sorry. I am going through List of content management systems to try to remove all the spam, that's why I have got so many AfDs and PRODs going on this kind of article. Jackaranga 17:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, in case's like this you can Speedy delete tag articles, which is much quicker than PROD, giving less time for tags to be removed--Jac16888 17:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment as the article claims notability (e.g., an award given by sourceforge.net), none of the Wikipedia:Criteria for Speedy Deletion apply. JulesH 18:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, in case's like this you can Speedy delete tag articles, which is much quicker than PROD, giving less time for tags to be removed--Jac16888 17:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There are loads of articles like this about software, I have tagged many with PROD, but people perhaps affiliated with the software just remove the tag without improving, so I have to use AfD, sorry. I am going through List of content management systems to try to remove all the spam, that's why I have got so many AfDs and PRODs going on this kind of article. Jackaranga 17:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If it's clear that an article's deletion will be contested in good faith, then it saves time and trouble in the end to take it directly to AfD.DGG (talk) 22:11, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Highly popular software, maybe the third or fourth most popular wiki server available. "About" 2.4 million google hits. Distributed with all major Linux distributions (which used to be a criteria on WP:SOFTWARE when we had it). Discussed in articles [1] [2] [3] etc. JulesH 18:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable, reviewed by the Linux Magazine (USA) [4], 180 hits on Google Scholar [5], 23 hits on Google Books [6]. I know some of those hits just reference websites that used it, but some cover it specifically. Karaboom 19:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable, I know that its used quite extensively here in the pacific islands. Agreed though that is horribly written and sounds spammy. --Xorkl000 21:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable. Was a nominee in the [http://sourceforge.net/community/index.php/landing-pages/cca07/ SourceForge 2007 Community Choice Awards (most collaborative project). --Ricks99 23:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.