Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Bomb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Professional wrestling throws#Tiger driver. Justin(c)(u) 00:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tiger Bomb[edit]
Tiger Bomb Comment it is a real move by wrestlers --PaysonSmithHall (talk) 01:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment What is your rationale for deletion? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One wrestling move itself is not notable enough for an article, however it could be included within a list of wrestling moves, such as in a variation of the Powerbomb. Also the article has very little context, and almost reads as nonsense, so this could be speedily deleted. Wildthing61476 (talk) 21:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, there is no evidence that this is actually the name of a move, or if the move even exists. Nikki311 23:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki311 18:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteA tiger bomb is a sitout double underhook powerbomb, nothing more, does not deserve its own article, but could redirect to it.LessThanClippers (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I just looked at the article we have for Powerbomb and the Tiger Bomb is referred to the article here. Might this be changed to a redirect to the wrestling throws article? Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Ugh. While some wrestling moves are notable enough for separate articles, specific variations of those moves are not. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.