Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger (pornographic actor)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tiger (pornographic actor)[edit]
- Tiger (pornographic actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PORNBIO and has been subject of recent major BLP violations Gaijin42 (talk) 15:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed - Fails - When this article was established in 2007, it met BLP and contained numerous inline citations to mainstream media sources. Most of these have been removed (although no reason has been given). In its current form, the article fails BLP and notability. - Tim1965 (talk) 16:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The guy has requested it. [1] He isn't a politician, or anyone who ever harmed anyone. So no reason not to honor his request. Dream Focus 17:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per subject's request. WildHorsesPulled (talk) 20:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — Frankie (talk) 16:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete What notability was claimed in the article was incidental to the subject. That's been removed now, and as the subject both requested that the article be deleted, and noted that it has already caused some harm, there isn't any reason for keeping it here. - Bilby (talk) 23:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.