Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tidy Trax

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 October 12.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 17:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tidy Trax[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability or assertion of notability. Has been tagged as missing references since 2009 but still no references or in-line citations. A small record label apparently Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of wp:notability. 6 year old article with ZERO references. Wording is badly promotional and unenclyclopedic. North8000 (talk) 12:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notability, nothing to recommend that it stands above other small record labels, and little to no results in a Google search other than what the company itself has put out. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.