Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tideswell Community Players

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tideswell Community Players[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable amateur theatre company, WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of reliable, secondary sources Cardiffbear88 (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable community theatre group. No significant coverage. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's a non-notable theatre company. No coverage. EverybodyEdits (talk) 18:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: an am-dram group with no evidence of notability. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I got for delete here. Needs more coverage to meet notability standards.MissiYasında&& (talk) 19:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.