Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tic Tac Toe, Shooting Gallery, Doodle, Quadradoodle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fairchild Channel F#List of games. Cirt (talk) 11:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tic Tac Toe, Shooting Gallery, Doodle, Quadradoodle[edit]

The notability of this article's subject is in question, also the article is an orphan and a dead-end. The article also has few external links and reliable sources. -- Patchy1^(talk) 03:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete It does bring up Google searches but it still doesn't seem fitting for Wikipedia.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 04:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fairchild Channel F#List of games - as the very first game for the system it has a reasonable claim to notability (and probable RS coverage at the time). However, there is no actual content here yet so a change to a redirect (as placeholder) is the best option. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per ThaddeusB. Further, I nominate the following similair articles as well: Spitfire (game), Video Blackjack and Desert Fox, Shooting Gallery. Guy0307 (talk) 06:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, although it's an unlikely search term. Mandsford (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The game also seems to go by 4-in-1([1], [2]) and Videocart 1 ([3]) —Ost (talk) 14:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. Little else to say, really. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 13:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the list these are just placeholders, if the list within the machine's article were fleshed out it could contain the same details (perhaps more if available) all in the same place. Someone another 15:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all per Guy0307. Dancter (talk) 18:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be exstended on, so that it stands out better as a article by wikipedia's standard. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 15:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.