Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thulasi Nair (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thulasi Nair[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No obvious notability NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 11:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - "She is following her sister's footsteps" but notability is not inherited. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to either Radha (her mother) or Karthika Nair until she gains significant notability. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt as this is the third nomination--180.172.239.231 (talk) 10:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect towards Radha (actress) (seems to be more high profile than Karthika Nair), and then Protect the redirect to prevent recreation. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable, featured in leading publications & has done notable work & been nominated for awards for her performance! A mystery why this article has repeatedly been targeted for deletion. Editor 2050 (talk) 13:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Answer to above question: Possibly because we cannot see what you do. Where are those leading publications, nominations etc? Please add them to the article. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Updated, added relevant material. Editor 2050 (talk) 18:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The article has the references that one would expect for this topic, IMO. However, the references with "{{cite web|author=The author has posted comments on this article |url=" should remove the "author=" portion, and if there is an author named on the article it should be listed in the reference. For example, the Times of India interview lists Karthik Pasupulate as the author of the article. Then I'd say this is a keep. LaMona (talk) 16:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The articles in The Times of India and The Hindu seem to be sufficient to establish WP:N. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:BASIC. Source examples include The Hindu, The Times of India, The Hindu, The Times of India, Sify (short article, sourced from Indo-Asian News Service. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:54, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable enough. Preetikapoor0 (talk) 01:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.