Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Throw Yo Neighborhood Up

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The statement "Wikipedia is free" is true. The statement "I can create anything I want" is not true. Wikipedia has notability guidelines and a verifiability policy. These criteria have not been demonstrated to have been met. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Throw Yo Neighborhood Up[edit]

Throw Yo Neighborhood Up (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM, being on a chart is not sufficient - there should be enough content for a standalone article SeraphWiki (talk) 18:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Add more sources in the article to ensure. --Leonardo.G G (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: You better close this discussion there's no need. --Leonardo.G G (talk) 19:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. SeraphWiki (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SeraphWiki (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I was still working on article checking the sources to add when you placed the article for deletion I'm just ordering you to undo your error so I fix the article and improve it. --Leonardo.G G (talk) 19:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Commment - Both sides probably could have acted a little better here: Nominator - It's generally considered bad form to nominate articles for deletion barely an hour after an article was created. You could give them a chance, or boldly redirect it if its nowhere close. Creator - If you've got such an incomplete, unsourced article, you may want to consider writing it as a WP:DRAFT first, so things like this don't happen. Also, so far, I spotchecked the three sources currently in the article, and none of the three sources source the information, nor are they what they appear to be based on their labels - all three link to entirely different things. For example, the "RapReviews" source links to an unrelated Allmusic article, for example. Not exactly sure what's going on there. Hopefully this was an accident and not done on purpose. Sergecross73 msg me 19:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I made mistakes about the sources I changed the wrong sources I would like to clarify here for you that I will never write fake things in Wikipedia I just answer the deletion article can not follow the whole rule but delete is not a good way to solve the problems. --Leonardo.G G (talk) 22:21, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But if you think the best way is to delete the article then go ahead with deletion according to the rules of Wikipedia but in my opinion the article is prepared and well referenced and you did not find the information on Billboard about the position of the album why did not you research go ahead and you will see clear information of the subject that is written in the article. --Leonardo.G G (talk) 22:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I merely pointed out that none of the sources provided in the article actually verified any of the content in the article. The links given in the article weren't working correctly. (As of writing this, this is still the case.) I have not voted to delete yet, though I likely will if sourcing isn't fixed/provided. My recommendation is to now list out the sourcing here to prove it is notable. Can you provide any direct links to in-depth album reviews or official Billboard charting positions? Doing so would be your best bet for persuading people out of deletion. Sergecross73 msg me 22:42, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry if I nominated this too quickly, but I think the AfD stays open for seven days so there is time to improve the article. I did a WP:BEFORE check and couldn't find anything. looking at the main article T-Rock is rated stub class and high importance for project hip-hop — wouldn't it be better to merge and redirect? SeraphWiki (talk) 00:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay. It's more of a courtesy thing than a hard rule. Conceptually, I understand your nomination. I haven't done a search for sources, but right now there's nothing in the article that confirms notability. For example, it alludes to an Allmusic Review, but the ref given doesn't link to it, nor does his Allmusic bio seem to suggest an album review exists, as far as I can see. No promising leads in the most basic of Google searches either... Sergecross73 msg me 02:32, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: So if this is the decision of the volunteers I leave the decision of all of you if you keep or delete yes or no the article on the artist's album. --Leonardo.G G (talk) 18:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Leonardo.G G - You keep making these unattached comments, like you're not part of this or something. Can you provide sources or not? Can you fix all the links of sources you claim to exist but cannot be found or not? Sergecross73 msg me 18:27, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,Sergecross73 msg me, I confused the sources the sources I put in the album article was not the album information but rather a rapper song than he did a part in the song. ---Leonardo.G G (talk) 18:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That still doesn't explain how half the refs you provided don't even contain "T-Rock" or "Throw Yo Neighborhood", but whatever. Sergecross73 msg me 19:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sergecross73 msg me
Wikipedia is free and I can create whatever I want even articles created without sources have exclude any unreferred articles so I will continue to create my friend whatever I want. Do you want to go to the personal side, is it because I am a Brazilian user? --Leonardo.G G (talk) 21:19, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is incorrect, and this sort of approach to Wikipedia will leave you with your articles deleted and your account blocked. The fact that you'd even suggest that shows how unfamiliar you are with Wikipedia policy. And no, it has nothing to do with being Brazilian. I didn't even know that you were from there. I have no prejudice towards Brazil, or even any knowledge in particular as to why anyone would be. Sergecross73 msg me 22:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Sergecross73 msg me − Has anyone ever decided what will happen to the article nominated for exclusion? –Leonardo.G G (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An uninvolved admin or experienced editor reviews it and decides after 7 days. Considering the article is unsourced and no one has provided any valid sourcing to prove notability, it will almost certainly be deleted. Sergecross73 msg me 23:06, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Throw_Yo_Neighborhood_Up&oldid=839647312"