Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Through the Flame of the Ages
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Arafel (band). Tone 14:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Through the Flame of the Ages[edit]
- Through the Flame of the Ages (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable album Jrtayloriv (talk) 22:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree with the proposal for deletion. The article does certainly need some reliable sources, but I don't think it's non-notable. The following is from the WP Notability guidelines: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." The band has a robust page of their own that has no notability issues, so this album page is supposedly notable too. Previous contributors have added enough information to get started. I think we should remove the PROD but add tags calling for more references, etc. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 09:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 23:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree that this is non-notable, unsourced, only 132 Google hits when duplicates are eliminated. (I also disagree with Doomsdayer520 that the band's own page has no notability issues - it is very poorly sourced.) Dawn Bard (talk) 15:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:NMG#Albums. December21st2012Freak Lord of the Vulcans 00:03, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Arafel (band). To respond to Doomsdayer520, WP:NMUSIC says "...ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles..." (keyword may) there just aren't any WP:RS for the album, sorry. J04n(talk page) 01:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Arafel (band). Arafel's notability is not really demonstrated in the band article, which has no reliable sources. I couldn't find any coverage of this album in reliable sources, so it's difficult to support keeping the article.--Michig (talk) 08:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.