Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threquel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy redirect to Sequel#Threquel, just like Threequel (AfD discussion) was when it came up for discussion. Redirects are cheap, and prevent a continual cycle of editors creating duplicate articles at alternative titles and those articles then being sent through AFD. Uncle G 20:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Threquel[edit]

(Tagged as AFD by anonymous user). Neologism. greenrd 01:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Belongs in a dictionary, not encyclopedia! Corpx 01:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NEO. Article even starts; "Threquel is a neologism". I have just AFDed a related list at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threquel 2007. Masaruemoto 02:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sequel#Threquel. Zagalejo 02:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Well, "threequel" seems to be the more common spelling. [1]. Forget the redirect. Zagalejo 02:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NEO I agree with Masaruemoto's reading of the article and guidelines. --Stormbay 03:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the article and WP:NEO. Resolute 03:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NOT (re: not a dictionary). Doczilla 06:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.