Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threesomething

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Threesomething[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, so far as I can tell hasn't been subject to any coverage. The sources in the article are laughably bad and I came up with nothing better in a search of newspapers, googles or most review sites. Praxidicae (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, plus the article creator, who provided almost all of the content, appears to be an WP:SPA with three edits to their name. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I found a review by Film Threat, which is good, but everything else looks to be either minor, primary, or created by self-published sources that wouldn't be usable on here. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and certainly doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:52, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.