Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thorne Research

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thorne Research[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks in-depth reliable news sources, google search doesn't turn anything significant. Fails general notability. Meeanaya (talk) 05:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Regarding in-depth reliable news sources, the article contains citations from USA Today, Bloomberg, the Associated Press, and the Pulitzer Prize winning paper "The Post and Courier" among a few others. Regarding google traffic, the peer-reviewed medical journal that Thorne Research owns, Alternative Medicine Review, has published hundreds of articles that can be found in google scholar when one searches "Thorne Research, Inc" Additionally, the website is viewed roughly 250,000 times/month according to a website analytic https://www.similarweb.com/website/thorne.com. Instead of deletion, could the page not simply be improved? TWJohn (talk) 06:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The Bloomberg citation is just Bloomberg's company database, but not significant coverage. AP is a press release. --213.220.69.6 (talk) 16:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Could a compromise be converting the article into a stub article? TWJohn (talk) 23:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 08:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Falls far below the criteria for establishing notability. None of the references feature independent content and all are either based on company announcements or interviews/quotations with the company and/or connected people, fails WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.