Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Wolf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Wolf[edit]

Minimal information given to establish WP:BIO, and nothing listed is verifiable. A brief Google search only turned up Wikipedia and Wikipedia mirrors when looking for this particular Thomas Wolf. fuzzy510 (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Might be notable if print sources were found to expand this article, but at present fails WP:V. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 15:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is some stuff out there, with Wolf and Wolfe alternatively (in relation to the RAND bit) but not enough to establish notability. The article seems to have been created because it had a redlink on the Team B article. In any case, it's an unsourced BLP. Unless someone can come up with solid WP:V, it should go. §FreeRangeFrog 01:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the article is far to short to establish any sort of context, leading me to conclude he's not notable. --Alinnisawest,^{Dalek Empress} (extermination requests here) 03:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.