Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Vose
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted as G7 - only author blanked the hoax article. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 01:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thomas Vose[edit]
- Thomas Vose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod (by creator). Prod reason was: Hoax article. All the refs and external links lead to articles on Ryan Bowman and the article seems to have been copied from Bowman's with a few changes. As far as I can tell, Carlisle United has never had a "Thomas Vose" play for them. Would CSD, but it's technically not "blatant". Also findmypast.com revealed that there is person called Thomas Joseph Vose, but they were born in 1996. Jenks24 (talk) 14:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 14:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 14:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As the nominator pointed out, all the content of the article has been copied from Ryan Bowman. It's pretty clear that this article is a hoax. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.