Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Schücke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Schücke[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly open and shut case of non-notability so unless he actually got some good coverage and it's archived, there's nothing to suggest keeping (this is also speedy and PROD material) and this has basically stayed the same since November 2006. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (express) 10:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources, and the @de Wikipedia article is exactly the same. If there are sources, they will be in German sources, and it seems clear that he doesn't have international acclaim. LaMona (talk) 22:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.