Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas M. Brady

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted per author's request by East718. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas M. Brady[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to source sufficient information to upgrade this any further than a stub; research suggests that as offered on the page, the subject does not meet notability for biographical articles. Sunil The Mongoose (talk) 11:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Lack of sufficient in-depth articles or sufficient article which has more than a passing mention. He is a non-notable bureaucrat. The closet thing I could find to a substantial article on him was an article in Stars and Stripes which mentions his appointment. But even that is not very notable as it is not an article on his accomplishments in his post, but merely an announcement that he was appointed to a new post.Knox490 (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability not yet established. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Speedy Delete as nominator and only substantial author of content. Sunil The Mongoose (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.