Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kupfer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 14:04, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Kupfer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO. ambassadors are not inherently notable. Gets a few mentions in routine coverage as an ambassador but lacking in depth coverage where he is the subject. There is also an astronomer of the same name. LibStar (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this could imaginably be acceptable, but there's nothing for the needed convincing independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:BIO. Tom29739 ^[talk] 07:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.