Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kretschmar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 19:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Kretschmar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. Fails WP:BIO. Originally posted a Prod on Feb. 2017, which was removed by the man himself. No coverage per WP:SIGCOV outwith the company. scope_creep (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, promo/advert from a nn individual, I opened the refs and translated - no RS there, google no better. Szzuk (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not demonstrate notability under WP:ANYBIO. Searches complicated by multiple false positives for other Thomas Kretschmers but no independent sources seem to include any significant coverage in English or German of this Thomas Kretschmer. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.