Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Huston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Huston[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:PROF - has a few journals published but nothing else. A search for sources brings back several Thomas Hustons, but nothing that's obviously related to this one. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Claim to notability is as a teacher. Uncontroversial case, probably could have been prodded. Agricola44 (talk) 14:45, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.