Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Henley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep. --Nishkid64 00:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thomas Henley[edit]
Does not meet WP:V. Not enough information to be certain who he is referring to. -Nv8200p talk 00:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I'd guess it is him unless there any other Thomas Henleys that fit the description. Yomanganitalk 00:44, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. Meets WP:BIO as a member of the NSW Parliament for 30 years and the Australian Dictionary of Biography article cited above by Yomangani provides verifiability. Needs to be expanded to at least a stub but notable enough for inclusion. Capitalistroadster 04:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 04:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand, per above. SquidSK (1MC--log) 08:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- stubs are articles too. Requires expansion, not deletion. - Longhair\talk 11:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 17:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep and expand per above. --mathewguiver 21:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems to easily meet WP:BIO to me. Lankiveil 21:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep per all above.UberCryxic 23:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.