Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thodi Der

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A Train^talk 13:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thodi Der[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-sound-track reviews.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.The critical reception section writes reviews but WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...; which is what is happening here.Youtube does not guarantee WP:GNG.Redirect to film article sought. Winged Blades^Godric 17:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep appears to scrape by on GNG. Artw (talk) 02:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article now have reliable coverage of the song by reputed Indian news media Times of India, as this is a Hindi film song, Times of India's reliable coverage will have some discussion about the film but focuses primarily on the song. Passes WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.Anoptimistix (talk) 11:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)— Note to closing admin: Anoptimistix (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:RS, has serious issues of impartiality of tone and undue weight, peacocking.-Umair Aj (talk) 09:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ De-bolden and strike dup !vote at 08:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC)by Winged Blades^Godric Article topic has coverage by "Goe News" Geo news is considered as a reputed reliable source after "Dawn in Pakistan. Geo news provides indepth coverage which makes the song worthy of having a Standalone article, thus it passes WP:RS as well as WP:NSONG. Further it also has deep coverage by India.com Anoptimistix Let's Talk 02:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.