Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Like a Winner!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Think Like a Winner![edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination after speedy deletion was overturned at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 November 19. Daniel (talk) 06:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:54, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Can someone with an active Newspapers.com subscription check these? I think I've found some coverage, but I need to get my subscription reupped before I can see them. Some may be duplicates, but I can't be entirely certain. ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]) ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Assessment:

[7] - a news piece interspersed with interview, originating in Ottawa Citizen.

[8] and [9] are the same. The first one in Fort Worth Star-Telegram is the original; I would rate it as a sigcov review; the text also covers a Faith Popcorn book

[10] - this article is about the publisher, mentioning TLIW

[11] - short review in four sentences

[12] - ad

I also removed to duplicate references from the article. Geschichte (talk) 11:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Geschichte! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. There is some coverage but it seems pretty niche/short. No major newspaper review, no awards... I think that fails GNG/NBOOK. Sadly the author is not notable for a redirect. In the end, most books are not notable and WP:NOTACATALOGUE of all books. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I looked at the references. The first is a promotional interview where the author says what he pleases. The second is an item in a list. The third is a brief local newspaper review. The 4th is itsl isting on Google Books. DGG ( talk ) 20:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.