Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThinkPoint

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ThinkPoint[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable malware ViperSnake151 Talk 18:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not "how to". W Nowicki (talk) 17:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Description of how a certain computer virus presents, that does not convey the cultural viewpoint of the virus. It is not totally unreferenced, as there is a link in there to bleeping computer, but the information in that source is a "use at your own risk" instruction. Unscintillating (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is essentially an advertisement considering it only lists what there is to say about, yet no actual substance and the history speaks for itself also. SwisterTwister talk 19:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What would be an example of substance that would not be advertising? Unscintillating (talk) 00:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.